- Portal links collected per client
- Developer and broker spreadsheets
- Private inventory lists updated by hand
- Country teams using different property fields
CleanedWeb for investment migration platforms
Turn property requirements into source-backed inventory.
Search supported property sources using the jurisdiction, asset and price criteria your advisors need—without presenting the data layer as a legal eligibility engine.
Advisor request
Workflow input
Request
Selected jurisdiction · Property purchase · Customer-supplied criteria
Property portals
Developer inventory
Agency listings
CleanedWeb result
A reviewable property set
Criteria applied · sources preserved · legal review remains with advisor
The operating problem
The legal workflow is structured. The property search usually is not.
Advisors often search public portals, request developer spreadsheets and maintain private inventories beside the client workflow. Property evidence becomes difficult to compare even when the program requirements are clear.
- The same development appears through several sellers
- Price, completion and property labels conflict
- Source evidence becomes detached from the shortlist
- Program rules are confused with listing data
One advisor request
Separate property discovery from legal eligibility.
CleanedWeb supplies current, normalized property evidence. The licensed advisor and customer organization own program interpretation, suitability and compliance.
Supply the criteria
Jurisdiction, customer-approved threshold logic, asset type, location and project requirements.
Search property sources
Query the supported portals, developer inventory and agency sources relevant to the jurisdiction.
Resolve the evidence
Normalize property facts and identify overlapping source assertions while preserving provenance.
Return for review
Deliver a structured property set to the advisor workflow for legal, commercial and customer assessment.
The data contract
The fields the workflow can actually use.
A record matching supplied criteria is not a representation of legal eligibility. Program interpretation and final verification remain with qualified advisors.
Canonical listing
CW-IM-SALE-42C1
- jurisdiction
- Customer selected
- intent
- Purchase
- property_type
- Residential
- asking_price
- Normalized currency
- project_status
- Source stated
- completion
- Source stated
- availability
- Observed active
- source_count
- Multiple assertions
Workflow filters
Jurisdiction
Customer threshold
Asset class
Price and currency
Project status
Completion stage
Location
Source type
What the platform can now operate
One data layer. Three concrete product surfaces.
Criteria-based discovery
Apply customer-approved property criteria to a maintained source set instead of rebuilding a shortlist from portal links.
Jurisdiction comparison
Represent property evidence through one contract while keeping each jurisdiction’s rules outside the listing record.
Advisor-ready evidence
Keep the original source and observed listing state attached to the record an advisor is reviewing.
Scope and boundaries
We maintain the listing layer. You operate the product.
- Supported property-source acquisition
- Property and project normalization
- Cross-source duplicate resolution
- Observed status and provenance
- Filtering against supplied criteria
- Program rules and legal interpretation
- Eligibility determinations
- Regulated advice and suitability
- KYC, AML and compliance
- Transactions and developer diligence
Relevant coverage
Scope property coverage around an actual jurisdiction workflow.
The relevant question is not whether a country appears in a directory. It is whether the supported sources, project fields and property classes are sufficient for the advisory workflow you intend to operate.
Explore current coverage →
Asset classes in scope
- Program rules are supplied and maintained by the customer.
- Coverage does not imply investment or immigration eligibility.
- Source and field requirements are reviewed for each jurisdiction.
Investment Migration FAQ
Questions to resolve before integration.
Does CleanedWeb determine whether a property qualifies for a program?
No. CleanedWeb provides property data and filtering infrastructure. Eligibility must be determined by qualified professionals using current law, program rules and transaction-specific evidence.
Can our own threshold rules be applied to the inventory?
Yes. Customer-supplied criteria can be used as query inputs or downstream filters when the required listing fields are available. CleanedWeb does not author or certify those rules.
How do advisors verify where a property came from?
Records preserve source attribution and the latest observed source state. When several assertions are resolved into one property identity, the contributing evidence can remain traceable.
Can developer inventory and public portal listings be combined?
They can share a normalized contract when both source classes are supported and the customer has the necessary access and usage rights. Duplicate policy can account for overlapping project and unit listings.
Do you provide historical program or property records?
The core use case is current property acquisition and delivery. Observed timestamps and state changes may exist within supported coverage, but a complete historical archive should not be assumed.
Does using CleanedWeb change our compliance obligations?
No. The customer remains responsible for regulated advice, KYC, AML, suitability, legal review and the rights governing its use of source content.
Start with one jurisdiction
Bring us the property workflow, not a country list.
We will review the sources, fields and evidence your advisors need while keeping legal eligibility outside the data contract.